If you’re not interested in doing localized edits, though, AfterShot’s compact one-screen workflow and better initial rendering might be able to convince you to switch programs. Speedy batching is great, but AfterShot’s clumsy localized editing has a long way to go to catch up to Lightroom’s excellent local options. While seems to be faster, there are still some issues that Corel will have to overcome to properly challenge Lightroom. AfterShot Pro uses its own proprietary algorithm to render RAW images, and it almost always produces better results than ACR. Lightroom uses the Adobe Camera RAW (ACR) algorithm to render images, which often come out with narrower tonal ranges and slightly washed-out colors. One of the most interesting differences between Lightroom and AfterShot Pro is the way they render the same RAW images. Front and center on the AfterShot Pro website is a claim that the latest version handles batch editing up to 4 times faster than Lightroom, and you can read the datasheet they published here (PDF). Is Corel AfterShot Pro Better Than Adobe Lightroom?ĪfterShot Pro is Corel’s direct challenge to Adobe Lightroom’s dominance of the RAW editing market, and they aren’t ashamed to admit it. A Closer Review of Corel AfterShot Pro 3.Is Corel AfterShot Pro Better Than Adobe Lightroom?.

Corel aftershot pro 3 presets